CALT is in pilot phase. Data is preliminary and subject to change.
Decided Judgment Hallucinated Citations Quebec
Specter Aviation sought homologation of a Paris arbitral award. Self-represented defendant Laprade filed pleadings containing at least eight fictitious case citations and doctrinal references generated by ChatGPT. First judicial sanction for AI misuse in Quebec litigation.
Court Cour supérieure du Québec
Citation 2025 QCCS 3521
Jurisdiction Quebec
Decided
Parties Plaintiff / Applicant: Specter Aviation Limited
Defendant / Respondent: Jean Laprade
Judge Juge Babak Barin

AI context

AI system: ChatGPT (OpenAI)

Self-represented defendant used ChatGPT to draft pleadings. The tool hallucinated at least eight case citations and legal references filed without verification.

Significance

First judicial monetary sanction for AI-generated fabricated citations in Quebec. Applied art. 342 C.p.c. (significant breach in conduct of proceedings) to AI misuse.

Outcome

Sanctions

$5,000 fine imposed under art. 342 C.p.c. for significant breach in conduct of proceedings — the first judicial sanction for AI misuse in Quebec litigation.

Sources

View on CanLII →